Breachlock
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Breachlock's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Breachlock |
| Focus | Native ASPM with built-in scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners | PTaaS |
| Extras | None | None | ASM, CTEM, MPT and Red team |
| Employees | 130 | Same | 122 |
| Reputation | 9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.21 from 133 reviews over 6 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 24K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | IDC, Omdia and GigaOM |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2019 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $3.1M USD in 2 rounds from 1 investor |
| Revenue | 5M to 10M | Same | 1M to 50M |
| CVE | 257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 0 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | Cyber Essentials |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26% | Same | 10K per month. Top 3: 36% BA, 15% IN, 15% KE and others 34% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 34 out of 100 |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | None |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | No |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing drivers | Groups | Authors | Frequency |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Breachlock |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | Yes |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | No information available |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Penetration testing by CREST |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 19 from 8 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Standards | Some requirements from 65 standards, 6 in common and 59 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 6 standards, all in common |
| Detection | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools, AI and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5, none in common | Same, plus 1 | 1, none in common |
| Outputs | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Breachlock |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | No |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not break the build |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 18 | Same, plus 4 | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 10 attack surface types | Same | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, none in common | Same | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Same | SaaS |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 6 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Breachlock |
| SCM | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 2 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 20, 3 in common and 17 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| SCA | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Container | Native scanner | Same | None |
| SAST | Native scanner | Same | None |
| DAST | Native scanner | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Compliance | None | None | 1 |
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
More like Breachlock
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.