Xygeni
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Xygeni’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Xygeni |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 32 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 38%, IT 13%, sales 3%, marketing 6%, operations 3% and others 37% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +23%, +28%, +39% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | ES |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | ES |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 10 from 9 reviews over 1 year on Capterra, G2 and PeerSpot |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 4K based on the following: LinkedIn and X |
| Research firms | None | None | IDC |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2021 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $4.32M USD in 1 round from 1 investor |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 5M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | None |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 19K per month. Top 3: 22% RU, 9% ES, 8% CO. Others 61% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 34 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Articles, blog, data sheets, documentation, e-books, glossary, product briefs, reports, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 5 in common and 8 additional sections | Same | 5 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (standard, premium, enterprise). First 2 transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | CI/CD security, Containers, IaC, SAST and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 10 developers |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Xygeni |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | No |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 8 in common and 59 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 11 standards, 8 in common and 3 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| Remediation | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Outputs | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Xygeni |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same , plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 3 sources, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Priority criteria |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 11 in common and 12 additional | Same | 12 package managers, 11 in common and 1 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 9 in common and 13 additional | Same | 12 package managers, 9 in common and 3 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 , 6 in common and 6 additional | Same | 6, all in common |
| **Source SAST ** **(frameworks) ** | 22 | Same | No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | SAST |
| IaC | 6Â , 5 in common and 1 additional | 4Â , 1 in common and 3 additional | 8, 6 in common and 2 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 3 functions , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 function in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license . Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Xygeni |
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 21 , 7 in common and 14 additional | Same | 7, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 2 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 4 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , all in common | Same | 3, all in common |
| CSPM | Native | Same | Native |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native and 1 integration |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information were xygeni.io and docs.xygeni.io, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
**More like Xygeni **
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on