Semgrep
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Semgrep’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Semgrep |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | In-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 224 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 8%, sales 19%, marketing 8%, operations 3% and others 30% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +18%, +35%, +52% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.96 from 69 reviews over 3 years on G2, Gartner and PeerSpot |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 22K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2017 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $193M USD in 4 rounds from 8 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 50M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 71K per month. Top 3: 32% US, 12% IN, 6% RU. Others 50% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 34 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, case studies, documentation, events and videos |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 8 in common and 5 additional | Same | 10 documentation sections, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat (Slack) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | 11 security education courses (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 30-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (teams and enterprise). First transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | SAST |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 11 developers |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Semgrep |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Response |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 2 in common and 65 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 2 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| False positives | 4.5 times better | 7.09 times better | 13% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 6.72 times better | 19.32 times better | 4% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5Â , all in common | Same, plus 1Â | 5, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Semgrep |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 1 in common and 3 additional | Same | 1 source in common |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 14 in common and 9 additional | Same | 17 package managers, 14 in common and 3 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages , 10 in common and 2 additional | Same | 10 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 14 in common and 8 additional | Same | 17 package managers, 14 in common and 3 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 , all in common | Same | 18, 12 in common and 6 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 , 6 in common and 16 additional | Same | 7, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | Yes |
| IaC | 6Â , 1 in common and 5 additional | 4Â | 1 in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 10 in common and 15 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 15 secrets types, 10 in common and 5 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | GNU LGPL 2.1 license, partially equivalent to the paid version |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | 5.08 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Semgrep |
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | None |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 14, 2 in common and 12 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 7 in common and 14 additional | Same | 7, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | 1 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | 1 |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was semgrep.dev, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Semgrep
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on