Cyver

Last updated: Mar 25, 2026


How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Cyver's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization

AttributeEssentialAdvancedCyver
FocusNative ASPM with Built-In ScannersAI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In ScannersPTaaS and MPT
ExtrasNoneNonePlatform for pentesting companies
Employees130Same9
Reputation9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and ClutchSameNo reviews
Followers18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTubeSame1K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research FirmsNoneNoneNone
Founded2001Same2020
FundingBootstrappedSameNo information available
Revenue5M to 10MSameNo information available
CVE257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwideSame0 CVEs reported to MITRE
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II and SOC 3SameSOC 2 Type II
DocumentationYesYesYes
Visits26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%Same10K per month. Top 3: 97% NL, 1% IN, 1% PK and others 1%
Authority31 out of 100Same19 out of 100
DistributionDirect or with any of its 14 partnersSameDirect
MarketplacesAWSSameAzure
FreemiumNoNoNo
Free trial21-day free trialPoV15-day free trial
DemoYesYesYes
PricingContact sales and marketplaceContact salesContact sales, marketplace and public web
Pricing driversGroupsAuthorsCredits or developers

Service

AttributeEssentialAdvancedCyver
PTaaSNoYesYes
Reverse engineeringNoYesYes
Secure code reviewNoYesYes
PivotingNoYesNo information available
ExploitationNoYesYes
Zero-day vulnerabilitiesNoContinuous zero-day vulnerability researchNone
SLAAvailabilityAccuracy, availability and responseAvailability, data traffic, filing a report, liability, planned maintenance, response and scheduled maintenance
AccreditationsCNA and Penetration Testing by CRESTSameNone
Pentester certificationsNot applicable202 from 59 different typesNot applicable
Type of contractEmployeeSameEmployee
StandardsSome requirements from 65 standards, 11 in common and 54 additionalAll requirements from the same standards19 standards, 11 in common and 8 additional
Detection methodAutomated toolsAI, Automated tools and human intelligenceHuman intelligence
Remediation5, 1 in common and 4 additionalSame, plus 11 in common
Outputs5, 3 in common and 2 additionalSame, plus 26, 3 in common and 3 additional

Product

AttributeEssentialAdvancedCyver
ASPMYesYesNo
IDE5 functionalitiesSame, plus 1 functionalityNo
CLIYesYesNo
CI/CDBreaks the buildSameDoes not break the build
SCA19 package managersSameNo
Reachability12 languagesSameNo
SBOM22 package managersSameNo
Containers4 distributionsSameNo
Source SAST (languages)18Same, plus 4No
Source SAST (frameworks)22SameNo
Binary SAST1 type of binarySame, plus 2 types of binariesNo
DAST10 attack surface typesSameNo
IASTNoNoNo
CSPMYesYesNo
Secrets15 secrets typesSame, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitabilityNo
AI4 functions, none in commonSameNo
Open sourceMPL-2.0 license. Totally equivalent to the paid versionNot applicableNo
DeploymentSaaSSameSaaS
RegionsUSSameEU, UK and US
StatusYesYesYes
Incidents6 per yearSameNo information available

Integrations

AttributeEssentialAdvancedCyver
SCM4SameNone
Binary repositoriesNoneNoneNone
Ticketing3, 2 in common and 1 additionalSame2, all in common
ChatOpsNoneNoneNone
IDE2SameNone
CI/CD20SameNone
SCANative scannerSameNone
ContainerNative scannerSameNone
SASTNative scannerSameNone
DASTNative scannerSameNone
IASTNoneNoneNone
Cloud3SameNone
CSPMNative scannerSameNone
SecretsNative scannerSameNone
ComplianceNoneNoneNone

More like Cyver

  1. NetSPI