Armosec
Last updated: Feb 5, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Armosec’s?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page .
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Armosec |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Cloud application detection and response (CADR) |
| Extras | None | None | Kubernetes Security Posture Management (KSPM) |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 86 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40% , IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 15%, IT 8%, sales 12%, marketing 5%, operations 15% and others 45% |
| Headcount growth | +14% , +15%, -1% | Same | +2%, +23%, +43% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IL and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, MX and US |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.37 from 44 reviews over 2 years on G2 |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 11K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Frost & Sullivan, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2019 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $34.5M USD in 4 rounds from 5 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 25M to 50M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | 10K per month. Top 3: 24% US, 15% IN,11% DE. Others 50% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 34 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Third-party |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, checklists, customer stories, data sheets, documentation, glossary, news, podcasts, surveys, white papers and webinars |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat (Slack) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 21-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (silver, gold, platinum). None transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPMÂ , binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SASTÂ , API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | CADR and KSPM |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 VM |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Virtual machines |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Armosec |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | No |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Support |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 9 in common and 58 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 9 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| Remediation | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 2, all in common |
| Output | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 7, 2 in common and 5 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Armosec |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 1 functionality in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2 sources, all in common |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12 | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | Scan controls and rules |
| IaC | 6Â | 4Â | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2 functions, all in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | Apache 2.0 license |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 1.3 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Armosec |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 6 |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on Mar 12, 2026. The primary sources of information were armosec.io and hub.armosec.io, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Armosec
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Tags
aspmcomparesbommalwaremcpopensource