Praetorian
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Praetorian’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Praetorian |
| Focus | Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | Native ASM |
| Extras | None | None | MPT , PTaaS and red team |
| Employees | 130 | Same | 171 |
| Reputation | 9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.23 from 6 reviews over 1 year on Gartner |
| Followers | 18K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 23K based on the following: Facebook , LinkedIn , X and YouTube |
| Research Firms | None | None | GigaOMÂ |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2010 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $10M USDÂ in 1 rounds from 2 investors |
| Revenue | 5M to 10M | Same | 10M to 100M |
| CVE | 257 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 0 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 26K per month. Top 3 : 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26% | Same | 41K per month. Top 3 : 41% US, 16% AE, 10% IN and others 33% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 34 out of 100 |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 30-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing drivers | Groups | Authors | Assets |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Praetorian |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | Yes |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | No information available |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Penetration Testing by CREST |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 211 from 48 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Standards | Some requirements from 65 standards , 7 in common and 58 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 7 standards , all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5Â , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1Â in common | 2Â , all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Praetorian |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same , plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not break the build |
| SCA | 24 package managers | Same | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 18 | Same , plus 4 | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 10 attack surface types , 4 in common and 6 additional | Same | 4 attack surface types , all in common |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 6 in common and 9 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 6 secret types , all in common |
| AI | 3 functions , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2 functions , 1 in common and 1 additional |
| Open source | MPL-2.0 license . Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Same | SaaS and on-premises |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 6 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Praetorian |
| SCM | 4 , 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3 , all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 3Â |
| IDE | 2 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 20 , 3 in common and 17 additional | Same | 3 , all in common |
| SCA | Native scanner | Same | 5 |
| Container | Native scanner | Same | 4 |
| SAST | Native scanner | Same | None |
| DAST | Native scanner | Same | 4 |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , all in common | Same | 6 , 3 in common and 3 additional |
| CSPM | Native scanner | Same | 3 |
| Secrets | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
References were last checked on Aug 06, 2025.
More like Praetorian
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on