Detectify

Last updated: Mar 25, 2026


How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Detectify's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization

AttributeEssentialAdvancedDetectify
FocusNative ASPM with built-in scannersAI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scannersASM
ExtrasNoneNoneDAST
Employees130Same101
Reputation9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and ClutchSame9.66 based from 54 reviews over 6 years on Capterra, G2 and Gartner
Followers18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTubeSame16K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firmsNoneNoneIDC and Frost & Sullivan
Founded2001Same2013
FundingBootstrappedSame$42M USD in 5 rounds from 10 investor
Revenue5M to 10MSame5M to 50M
CVE257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwideSame0 CVEs reported to MITRE
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II and SOC 3SameISO/IEC 27001
DocumentationYesYesYes
Visits26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%Same50K per month. Top 3: 49% IN, 35% US, 2% KG and others 14%
Authority31 out of 100Same38 out of 100
DistributionDirect or with any of its 14 partnersSameDirect or with any of its partners
MarketplacesAWSSameAWS
FreemiumNoNoNo
Free trial21-day free trialPoV15-day free trial
DemoYesYesYes
PricingContact sales and marketplaceContact salesContact sales and marketplace
Pricing driversGroupsAuthorsAssets

Service

AttributeEssentialAdvancedDetectify
PTaaSNoYesNo
Reverse engineeringNoYesNo
Secure code reviewNoYesNo
PivotingNoYesNo
ExploitationNoYesNo
Zero-day vulnerabilitiesNoneContinuous zero-day vulnerability researchNone
SLAAvailabilityAccuracy, availability and responseAvailability
AccreditationsCNA and Penetration Testing by CRESTSameNone
Pentester certificationsNot applicable202 from 59 different typesNot applicable
Type of contractEmployeeSameEmployee or freelance
StandardsSome requirements from 65 standards, 4 in common and 61 additionalAll requirements from the same standards4 standards, all in common
DetectionAutomated toolsAI, Automated tools and human intelligenceAutomated tools
Remediation5, 2 in common and 3 additionalSame, plus 12, all in common
Outputs5, 2 in common and 3 additionalSame, plus 25, 2 in common and 3 additional

Product

AttributeEssentialAdvancedDetectify
ASPMYesYesNo
IDE5 functionalitiesSame, plus 1 functionalityNo
CLIYesYesYes
CI/CDBreaks the buildSameDoes not break the build
SCA19 package managersSameNo
Reachability12 languagesSameNo
SBOM22 package managersSameNo
Containers4 distributionsSameNo
Source SAST (languages)18Same, plus 4No
Source SAST (frameworks)22SameNo
Binary SAST1 type of binarySame, plus 2 types of binariesNo
DAST10 attack surface typesSameYes. No information available
IASTNoNoNo
CSPMYesYesNo
Secrets15 secrets typesSame, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitabilityNo
AI4 functions, none in commonSameNo
Open-sourceMPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid versionNot applicableNo
DeploymentSaaSSameSaaS
RegionsUSSameIE, IN and US
StatusYesYesYes
Incidents6 per yearSameNo incidents

Integrations

AttributeEssentialAdvancedDetectify
SCM4SameNone
Binary repositoriesNoneNoneNone
Ticketing3, 1 in common and 2 additionalSame2, 1 in common and 1 additional
ChatOpsNoneNone2
IDE2SameNone
CI/CD20SameNone
SCANative scannerSameNone
ContainerNative scannerSameNone
SASTNative scannerSameNone
DASTNative scannerSameNative scanner
IASTNoneNoneNone
Cloud3, all in commonSame8, 3 in common and 5 additional
CSPMNative scannerSameNone
SecretsNative scannerSameNone
ComplianceNoneNoneNone

More like Detectify

  1. AppCheck
  2. Bright Security
  3. Probely
  4. StackHawk
  5. Tenable Nessus