Conviso
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Conviso’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Conviso |
| Focus | Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners |
| Extras | None | None | Red team , MPT , PTaaS , Security training and WAF |
| Employees | 139 | Same | 85 |
| Reputation | 9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.23 from 9 reviews over 3 years on Gartner and Software Advice |
| Followers | 18K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 7K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube |
| Research Firms | None | None | Frost & Sullivan |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2008 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Revenue | 5M to 10M | Same | 1M to 50M |
| CVE | 257 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Pending |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | ISO/IEC 20000 and ISO/IEC 27001 |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 26K per month. Top 3 : 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26% | Same | 10K per month. Top 3 : 39% BR, 22% IN, 11% US and others 28% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 29 out of 100 |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | No |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales , marketplace and public web site |
| Pricing drivers | Groups | Authors | Developers |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Conviso |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No. MPT |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Support |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 17 from 10 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Standards | Some requirements from 65 standards , 4 in common and 61 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 4 standards , all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5Â | Same, plus 1Â | 5Â , all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 4Â , all in common |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Conviso |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 2 functionalities , all in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| SCA | 24 package managers , 8 in common and 16 additional | Same | 9 package managers , 8 in common and 1 additional |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 11 in common and 11 additional | Same | 21 package managers , 11 in common and 10 additional |
| Containers | 4 distributions , 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 15 distributions , 3 in common and 12 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 18 , 11 in common and 7 additional | Same , plus 4. 2 in common and 2 additional | 17 , 13 in common and 4 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 , 2 in common and 20 additional | Same | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 10 attack surface types , 2 in common and 8 additional | Same | 4 attack surface types , 2 in common and 2 additional |
| IAST | No | No | Yes . No information available |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 2 in common and 13 additional. | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 5 secrets types , 2 in common and 3 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 function in common |
| Open source | MPL-2.0 license . Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Same | SaaS and on-premises |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 6 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Conviso |
| SCM | 4 , 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2Â |
| IDE | 2 , 1 in common and 1 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 20 , 8 in common and 12 additional | Same | 8 , all in common |
| SCA | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner and 2 integration |
| Container | Native scanner | Same | None |
| SAST | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner and 4 integrations |
| DAST | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner |
| IAST | None | None | Native scanner |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.
More like Conviso
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on