ZeroPath
Last updated: Mar 5, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to ZeroPath’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | ZeroPath |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | In-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | Incident response, MPT and PTaaS |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 6 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 17%, IT 17%, marketing 17% and others 49% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | 0%, +20% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | DE and US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | No reviews |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 1K based on the following: LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2024 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $500K USD in 2 rounds from 4 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 5M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 3 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 7K per month. Top 3: 26% US, 12% IN, 11% CN. Others 51% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 26 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog and documentation |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 3 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat (discord) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | None |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | No |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (Core, Enterprise). One transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 5 repositories |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Repositories |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | ZeroPath |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No information available |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | Yes |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research powered by AI |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Response (Managed appsec) |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 5 from 3 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | No |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | No |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 11 in common and 56 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 14 standards, 11 in common and 3 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools, AI and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 4, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , none in common | Same, plus 2Â | 2, none in common |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | ZeroPath |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 1 functionality in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v4.0 |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers , 10 in common and 13 additional | Same | 12 package managers, 10 in common and 2 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 8 in common and 14 additional | Same | 12 package managers, 8 in common and 4 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 5 distributions, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| **Source SAST ** **(languages) ** | 12 , 11 in common and 1 additional | Same | 18, 11 in common and 7 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 , 5 in common and 17 additional | Same | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | Yes |
| IaC | 6Â , 4 in common and 2 additional | 4Â , 2 in common and 2 additional | 7, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary in common | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | 1 type of binary in common |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs , 3 in common and 1 additional | 4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 3 in common and 8 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 11 secrets type, 3 in common and 8 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | ZeroPath |
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 5, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was zeropath.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like ZeroPath
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .