Veracode
Last updated: Mar 5, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Veracode’s?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page .
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | MPT and PTaaS |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 519 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40% , IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 28%, IT 17%, sales 14%, marketing 3%, operations 3% and others 35% |
| Headcount growth | +14% , +15%, -1% | Same | +4%, -8%, -24% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | UK and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | UK and US |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.47 from 772 reviews over 10 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 115K based on the following social media: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, GigaOM and IDC |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2006 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $114.3M USD in 7 rounds from 14 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 4 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | FedRAMP Authorized and SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | 616K per month. Top 3: 18% US, 10% IN, 5% UK. Others 67% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 45 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation, e-books, infographics, podcast, videos, webinars and whitepapers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | 7 documentation sections, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | Security education platform with 55 courses (subscription-based) and 58 security education courses (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 545 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and Azure |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (SAST, DAST, SCA). None transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPMÂ , binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SASTÂ , API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | ASPM, containers, DAST, PTaaS, SAST and SC |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Authors and techniques |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | Yes |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | 1 reattack |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Availability |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per minute year | Same | 99% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | DevOps ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and Penetration Testing by CREST |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 54 from 25 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 18 in common and 49 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 32 standards, 27 in common and 5 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools, AI and human intelligence |
| False positives | 36.03 times better | 56.67 times better | 1.64% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 64.59 times better | 185.73 times better | 0.41% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 3, all in common |
| Output | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON and XML |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 1 in common and 3 additional | Same | 10 sources, 1 in common and 9 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v3.0, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | None |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (Grype for Containers and Trivy for IaC and Secrets) |
| SCA | 19 package managers , 13 in common and 6 additional | Same | 19 package managers, 13 in common and 6 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | No information available |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 11 in common and 11 additional | Same | 19 package managers, 11 in common and 8 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12 , 11 in common and 1 additional | Same | 23, 11 in common and 12 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 , 18 in common and 4 additional | Same | 69, 18 in common and 41 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | SCA |
| IaC | 6Â , 4 in common and 2 additional | 4Â , 2 in common and 2 additional | 6, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | 6 types of binaries, 1 in common and 5 additional |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types , 2 in common and 5 additional | Same | 6 attack surface types (only web based), 5 in common and 1 additional |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs , 3 in common and 1 additional | 1 type of API in common |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 5 in common and 10 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 5 secrets types, all in common |
| AI | 3 functions , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 function in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | EU and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 5.25 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , all in common | Same | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 6 |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 6, 2 in common and 4 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 10 in common and 11 additional | Same | 10, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | 1 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 6 |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on Feb 19, 2026. The primary sources of information were veracode.com and docs.veracode.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Veracode
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Tags
apiaspmbinarycomparecontainersdastexploitationiacmalwaremptpivotingptaasrereachabilitysastsbomsca