Veracode
Last updated: Oct 15, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Veracode's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | MPT, PTaaS and security training |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 506 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 27%, IT 15%, sales 16%, marketing 4%, operations 3% and others 35% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | -1%, -6%, -22% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | GB and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | GB and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 8.13 from 893 reviews over 11 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, GetApp, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 111K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, Gartner, GigaOM, IDC and Latio |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2006 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | 114.3M USD in 7 rounds from 14 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 1 time and made 4 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | None |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | EU-US DFP, FedRAMP Authorized, GDPR, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II, StateRAMP Authorized and TX-RAMP |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 188K per month. Top 3: 37% US, 10% IN, 4% NG. Others 49% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 43 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, case studies, datasheets, documentation, e-books, events, glossary, infographics, news, reports, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | 9 documentation sections, 7 in common and 2 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | Security education platform (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 449 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | No information available |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | ASPM, containers, DAST, SAST and SCA |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Authors and techniques |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Response |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | DevOps ISV Competency, Penetration Testing by CREST and Security ISV Competency |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 26 from 14 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 15 in common and 52 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 20 standards, 15 in common and 5 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI, automated tools and human intelligence |
| False positives | 36.03 times better | 56.67 times better | 1.64% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 64.59 times better | 185.73 times better | 0.41% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 in common | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON and XML |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 6 functionalities, 4 in common and 2 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 7 in common and 11 additional | Same | 19 sources, 7 in common and 12 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Transitivity and Use | Same | CVSS v3.0, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Policies |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (DryRun Security for AI SAST, Grype for containers) |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 13 in common and 6 additional | Same | 22 package managers, 13 in common and 9 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 14 languages, 9 in common and 5 additional | Same | 9 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | No information available |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 13 in common and 9 additional | Same | 22 package managers, 13 in common and 9 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 8 distributions, 3 in common and 5 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14, 12 in common and 2 additional | Same | 26, 12 in common and 14 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23, 20 in common and 3 additional | Same | 66, 20 in common and 46 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | SCA |
| IaC | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | 2, all in common | 9, 6 in common and 3 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | 12 types of binaries, 3 in common and 9 additional |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional | Same | 7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, 1 in common and 3 additional | 1 type of API in common |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 228 secrets types, 68 in common and 160 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 57 secrets types, 49 in common and 8 additional |
| AI | 4 functions, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 function in common | 4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | Yes |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | EU and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 3.58 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Veracode |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 3 |
| Ticketing | 3, all in common | Same | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 8, 2 in common and 6 additional |
| CI/CD | 21, 9 in common and 12 additional | Same | 11, 9 in common and 2 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 4 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native and 3 integrations |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 5 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native and 1 integration |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 9 |
| Compliance | None | None | 1 |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-10-06. The primary sources of information were veracode.com and docs.veracode.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Veracode
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' pentesting team, fill out this contact form.