Fortify
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
This comparison focuses exclusively on the product itself, even though it belongs to a larger parent company. All information collected is based on the product’s technical, functional, and theoretical capabilities, not on attributes of the parent company.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.18 from 180 reviews over 9 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Research firms | None | None | Gartner and Info-Tech Research Group as OpenText |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR and FedRAMP |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, data sheets, documentation, success stories, videos and webinars |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 4 in common and 9 additional | Same | 4 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum by OpenText |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 3 product use courses by OpenText (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 15-day free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplaces |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | No information available |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | No information available |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 assessment unit |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Applications |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No information available |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Scan time |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, Data & Analytics ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and CNA (as OpenText) |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 18 in common and 49 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 19 standards, 18 in common and 1 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| Remediation | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 | 4, all in common |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 7 functionalities, 2 in common and 5 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional | Same | No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | No information available |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 14 in common and 5 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 14 in common and 6 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages, 2 in common and 10 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 12 in common and 10 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 12 in common and 8 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12, all in common | Same | 25, 12 in common and 13 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22, 19 in common and 3 additional | Same | 49, 19 in common and 30 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | SAST and SCA |
| IaC | 6, 2 in common and 4 additional | 4, 1 in common and 3 additional | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | 3 types of binaries, none in common |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional | Same | 6 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, all in common | 7 types of APIs, 4 in common and 3 additional |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 7 secrets types, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| AI | 4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3 functions, all in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license, totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMS, APAC, EMEA and SGP |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 10.3 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| CI/CD | 21, 6 in common and 15 additional | Same | 7, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 5 integrations |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 1 integration |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | 2 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on Mar 10, 2026. The primary sources of information were opentext.com and microfocus.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Fortify
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
apiaspmbinarycomparedastiacmcpsastsbomscasecrets