Fortify
Last updated: Oct 15, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
This comparison focuses on the product itself, although some attributes in this comparison draw information from the larger parent company it belongs to OpenText.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 22,840 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 29%, IT 15%, sales 11%, marketing 2%, operations 5% and others 38% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | -2%, -2%, -1% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AU, BR, CA, DE, JP and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IN and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 8.77 from 506 reviews over 11 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 597K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Gartner and IDC |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2002 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 10M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | None |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | FedRAMP Authorized and ISO/IEC 27001 |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 1.2M per month. Top 3: 27% US, 22% IN and 9% CA. Others 42% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 54 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, data sheets, documentation, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum by OpenText |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 3 product use courses (paid) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 7 product use courses (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | Free-trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplace and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (Premium and Enterprise). Transparent. |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | SCA |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | 1 developer |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers and assessment units |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | MPT and PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No information available |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No information available |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | 1 reattack |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Availability, response and scan time |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.5% per quarter |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | CNA and Security ISV Competency (as OpenText) |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 116 from 24 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 15 in common and 52 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 21 standards, 15 in common and 6 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI, automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 in common | 5, all in common |
| Output | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2 | 8, 4 in common and 4 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 9 functionalities, 4 in common and 5 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 2 in common and 16 additional | Same | 9 sources, 2 in common and 7 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Transitivity and Use | Same | CVSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 18 in common and 1 additional | Same | 22 package managers, 18 in common and 4 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 14 languages, 2 in common and 12 additional | Same | 2 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 18 in common and 4 additional | Same | 22 package managers, 18 in common and 4 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 3 distributions, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14, 12 in common and 2 additional | Same | 30, 12 in common and 18 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23, 13 in common and 10 additional | Same | 309, 13 in common and 296 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | SAST |
| IaC | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional | 7, 5 in common and 2 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary in common | Same, plus 2 types of binaries, 1 in common and 1 additional | 5 types of binaries, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 2 in common and 5 additional | Same | 6 attack surface types, 2 in common and 4 additional |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, all in common | 7 types of APIs, 4 in common and 3 additional |
| MAST | No | Yes | Yes |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 228 secrets types, 116 in common and 112 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 172 secrets types, 116 in common and 56 additional |
| AI | 4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 function | 5 functions, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMS, APAC, EMEA, EU, SGP and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 3.7 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Fortify |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| CI/CD | 21, 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 2 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 1 integration |
| MAST | None | Native | Native |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | 1 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-10-02. The primary sources of information were opentext.com and microfocus.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Fortify
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' pentesting team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
aisecurityapiaspmautofixbinarycomparecontainersdastiacmalwaremastmcpmptptaasreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets