NetSPI

Last updated: Mar 25, 2026


How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to NetSPI's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization

AttributeEssentialAdvancedAcunetix
FocusNative ASPM with Built-In ScannersAI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In ScannersDAST
ExtrasNoneNoneDynamic SCA
Employees130Same34
Reputation9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and ClutchSame8.44 from 322 reviews over 9 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTubeSame17K based on the following: LinkedIn and X
Research FirmsNoneNone451 Research, IDC, Omdia and GigaOM
Founded2001Same2005
FundingBootstrappedSameNo information available
Revenue5M to 10MSame5M to 25M
CVE257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwideSame0 CVEs reported to MITRE
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II and SOC 3SameISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II
DocumentationYesYesYes
Visits26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%Same33K per month. Top 3: 27% US, 26% UK, 9% IN and others 38%
Authority31 out of 100Same46 out of 100
DistributionDirect or with any of its 14 partnersSameDirect or with any of its partners
MarketplacesAWSSameAWS and Azure
FreemiumNoNoNo
Free trial21-day free trialPoVPoV
DemoYesYesYes
PricingContact sales and marketplaceContact salesContact sales and marketplaces
Pricing driversGroupsAuthorsTargets

Service

AttributeEssentialAdvancedAcunetix
PTaaSNoYesNo
Reverse engineeringNoYesNo
Secure code reviewNoYesNo
PivotingNoYesNo
ExploitationNoYesYes
Zero-day vulnerabilitiesNoneContinuous zero-day vulnerability researchNone
SLAAvailabilityAccuracy, availability and responseAvailability and response
AccreditationsCNA and Penetration Testing by CRESTSameNone
Pentester certificationsNot applicable202 from 59 different typesNot applicable
Type of contractEmployeeSameEmployee
StandardsSome requirements from 65 standards, 15 in common and 50 additionalAll requirements from the same standards15 standards, all in common
Detection methodAutomated toolsAI, Automated tools and human intelligenceAutomated tools
Remediation5, 1 in common and 4 additionalSame, plus 11 in common
Outputs5, 2 in common and 3 additionalSame, plus 26, 2 in common and 4 additional

Product

AttributeEssentialAdvancedAcunetix
ASPMYesYesNo
IDE5 functionalitiesSame, plus 1 functionalityNo
CLIYesYesNo
CI/CDBreaks the buildSameBreaks the build
SCA19 package managersSameYes. No information available
Reachability12 languagesSameNo
SBOM22 package managersSameNo
Containers4 distributionsSameNo
Source SAST (languages)18Same, plus 4No
Source SAST (frameworks)22SameNo
Binary SAST1 type of binarySame, plus 2 types of binariesNo
DAST10 attack surface types, 7 in common and 3 additionalSameNo
IASTNoNo4 languages and frameworks
CSPMYesYesNo
Secrets15 secrets typesSame, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitabilityNo
AI4 functions, none in commonSameNo
Open sourceMPL-2.0 license. Totally equivalent to the paid versionNot applicableNo
DeploymentSaaSSameSaaS and on-premises
RegionsUSSameCA, EU and US
StatusYesYesYes
Incidents6 per yearSame13.7 per year

Integrations

AttributeEssentialAdvancedAcunetix
SCM4SameNone
Binary repositoriesNoneNoneNone
Ticketing3, 2 in common and 1 additionalSame6, 2 in common and 4 additional
ChatOpsNoneNone3
IDE2SameNone
CI/CD20, 9 in common and 11 additionalSame9, all in common
SCANative scannerSameNative scanner
ContainerNative scannerSameNone
SASTNative scannerSame1
DASTNative scannerSameNative scanner
IASTNoneNoneNative scanner
Cloud3SameNone
CSPMNative scannerSameNone
SecretsNative scannerSameNone
ComplianceNoneNone1

More like NetSPI

  1. Cyver