Codacy
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Codacy’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page .
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Codacy |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPMand external scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 72 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 29%, IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 4%, operations 7% and others 34% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +7%, +13%, -5% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | PT and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | PT and UK |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.37 from 50 reviews over 9 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 28K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2012 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $29.4M USD in 5 round from 10 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 5M to 25M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 53K per month. Top 3: 24% US, 11% IN, 6% DE. Others 59% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 38 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation, events, news, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplace and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (team, business, audit). First transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 developer |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Codacy |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | No |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 3 in common and 64 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 3 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| Remediation | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 4, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Codacy |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 4 functionalities, all in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | None |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | External (ZAP for DAST; Checkov for IaC; Semgrep, Bandit, Brakeman, Flawfinder, and Gosec for SAST; Checkov and Semgrep for Secrets; and Trivy for Containers, Secrets and SCA) |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 14 in common and 9 additional | Same | 24 package managers, 14 in common and 10 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 17 in common and 5 additional | Same | 24 package managers, 17 in common and 7 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 15 distributions, 2 in common and 13 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 , all in common | Same | 29, 12 in common and 17 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 , 6 in common and 16 additional | Same | 7, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6Â , 4 in common and 2 additional | 4Â , 2 in common and 2 additional | 6, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types , 3 in common and 4 additional | Same | 4 attack surface types, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs , 3 in common and 1 additional | 3 types of APIs, all in common |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 11 in common and 4 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 31 secrets types, 11 in common and 20 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , all in common | Same | 3 functions, all in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | IE |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | 4.7 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Codacy |
| SCM | 6 , 3 in common and 3 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 1 |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 , all in common | Same | 19, 3 in common and 16 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 3 in common and 18 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native powered by Trivy |
| Container | Native | Same | Native powered by Trivy |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native powered by Semgrep, Bandit, Brakeman, Flawfinder and Golang |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native powered by ZAP |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native powered by Checkov, Semgrep and Trivy |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information were codacy.com and docs.codacy.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Codacy
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on