Cycode
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Cycode’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Cycode |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with built-In Scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 161 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 9%, sales 14%, marketing 6% and others 39% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | -1%, +7%, 26% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IL and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, US and PL |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.73 from 55 reviews over 4 years on G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 21K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Gartner, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2019 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $80.6M USDin 3 rounds from 6 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 1 acquisition |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 4M to 38M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 17K per month. Top 3: 25% US, 13% ZA, 11% IN. Others 51% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 32 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, e-books, reports and webinars |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections | Same | No |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 10 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplaces |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 1 plan |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | ASPM |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 developer |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Cycode |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Availability and response |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | >=99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 12 in common and 55 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 12 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| False positives | 6.04 times better | 9.5 times better | 10% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 5.25 times better | 15.1 times better | 5% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| Outputs | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Cycode |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | GraphQL with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 3 functionalities, all in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Risk score |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 23 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes. AIBOM |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| **Source SAST ** **(languages) ** | 12 , 10 in common and 2 additional | Same | 18 languages, 10 in common and 8 additional |
| **Source SAST ** **(frameworks) ** | 22 | Same | No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | Secrets |
| IaC | 6Â , 3 in common and 3 additional | 4Â , 1 in common and 3 additional | 4, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | Yes. No information available |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 3 functions , all in common | Same | 3 functions, all in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license . Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | EU and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | 2.1 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Cycode |
| SCM | 6 , 5 in common and 1 additional | Same | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 10 |
| Ticketing | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 18, 2 in common and 16 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 8 in common and 13 additional | Same | 9, 8 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 13 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 10 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | 10 |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , all in common | Same | 3, all in common |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 8 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | 1 |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 1 |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was cycode.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
**More like Cycode **
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on