Faraday Security
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Faraday Security’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Faraday |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Vulnerability management |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 55 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 18%, IT 20%, sales 7%, marketing 4%, operations 5% and others 46% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | 0%, +4%, +20% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AR and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | AR |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 10 from 10 reviews over 1 year on G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 14K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn and X |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2014 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 5M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | None |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 8K per month. Top 3: 40% ES, 9% CN, 8% DZ. Others 43% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 25 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation and support |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | None |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 5-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (professional and corporate). All transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | ASOC |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 129 assets |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Assets |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Faraday |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | No |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 6 from 5 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 7 in common and 60 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 10 standards, 7 in common and 3 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5Â , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| Outputs | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Faraday |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same , plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | None |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v4.0 |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | None |
| SCA | 23 package managers | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 | Same | No |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6Â | 4Â | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 3 functions | Same | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | GNU LGPL 3 license, partially equivalent to the paid version |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Faraday |
| SCM | 6 | Same | None |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 21 , 3 in common and 18 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | 5 |
| Container | Native | Same | 3 |
| SAST | Native | Same | 5 |
| DAST | Native | Same | 10 |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , none in common | Same | 5, none in common |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 2 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | 1 |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information were faradaysec.com and docs.faradaysec.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
**More like Faraday Security **
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on