JFrog Xray
Last updated: May 8, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to JFrog Xray's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
This comparison focuses on the product itself, although some attributes in this comparison draw information from the larger parent company it belongs to.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog Xray |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | SCA |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 2,332 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 11%, sales 11%, marketing 3%, operations 6% and others 37% |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | +4%, +15%, +35% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | CN, ES, FR, GB, IL, IN, JP, SG and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, IN and US |
| Reputation | 9.44 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 7.54 from 16 reviews over 4 years on Capterra and PeerSpot |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 145K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2008 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $226.5M USD in 6 rounds from 12 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 8 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 118 CVEs reported to MITRE by JFrog |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and TISAX |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 431K per month. Top 3: 15% US, 8% DE, 7% IN. Others 70% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 46 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | JFrog - Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Articles, blog, datasheets, documentation, e-books, events, executive brief, infographics, press releases, reports, research, use cases, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 4 documentation sections, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum by JFrog |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 4 live security education courses by JFrog (subscription-based) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 6 product use courses with certification by JFrog (subscription-based) and 1 product use course (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 310 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (Pro, Enterprise X, Enterprise +). First two transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | SCA |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 25 GB base consumption |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | GB-based consumption (storage + transfer) |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog Xray |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research by JFrog |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Response and availability |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, DevOps ISV Competency and CNA (as JFrog) |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 5 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 2, all in common |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog Xray |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v3.0 and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 10 in common and 9 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 10 in common and 10 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | No information available |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 7 in common and 15 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 7 in common and 13 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12, 7 in common and 5 additional | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22, 11 in common and 11 additional | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | SCA |
| IaC | 6, 2 in common and 4 additional | 4, none in common | 2, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary in common | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 2 in common and 5 additional | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional | No |
| MAST | No | Native | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, none in common | Same, plus 1 function in common | 3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (single and multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMER, APAC and EMEA |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog Xray |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 1 in common and 5 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, all in common | Same | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| CI/CD | 21, 4 in common and 17 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on May 08, 2026. The primary sources of information were jfrog.com and docs.jfrog.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like JFrog Xray
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.