OX Security
Last updated: Nov 4, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to OX Security's?
These tables compare the solutions of the two providers, attribute by attribute. Use them to compare the solutions for the cybersecurity requirements of your company. To learn what each attribute means, read the descriptions of the attributes.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 191 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 26%, IT 10%, sales 18%, marketing 4%, operations 5% and others 37% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | +5%, +14%, +71% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IL and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 9.12 from 80 reviews over 2 years on Capterra, G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 61K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Frost & Sullivan, GigaOM, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2021 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $94M USD in 4 rounds from 9 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 35M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 7 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 47K per month. Top 3: 22% US, 10% CN, 8% IL. Others 60% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 38 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, case studies, data sheets, documentation, events, podcast, reports, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 6 documentation sections, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 58 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and Azure |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplace and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 4 plans (Startup, professional, scale and enterprise). First 2 transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | SAST, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | 1 developer |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Support |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 9 in common and 58 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 9 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 | 4, all in common |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | GraphQL with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources | Same | No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Reachability, Transitivity, Use and VLAI | Same | CVSS, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | None |
| SCA | 21 package managers, 18 in common and 3 additional | Same | 19 package managers, 18 in common and 1 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 14 languages, 8 in common and 4 additional | Same | 10 languages, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 24 package managers, 14 in common and 10 additional | Same | 19 package managers, 14 in common and 5 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14, 13 in common and 1 additional | Same | 17, 13 in common and 4 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23 | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | 2, none in common | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | Yes. No information available |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | Yes. No information available |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | Yes. No information available |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secrets | 313 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 5 functions, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5 functions, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, all in common | Same | 6, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, all in common | Same | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 23, 8 in common and 15 additional | Same | 10, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 18 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native and 18 integrations |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 15 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 5 integrations |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 9 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native and 8 integrations |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Fluid Attacks last updated these tables on 2026-10-13. The primary sources of information were ox.security and docs.ox.security. Fluid Attacks also used specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like OX Security
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your applications at no cost with the automated security testing of Fluid Attacks. Start your 21-day free trial and see the benefits of the Essential plan. The Advanced plan includes the expertise of the pentesting team of Fluid Attacks. To get the Advanced plan, complete this contact form.
Tags
apibinarycomparecontainerscspmdastiacmcpreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets