Strike
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Strike's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Strike |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | PTaaS |
| Extras | None | None | ASM, compliance suite and phishing monitor |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 78 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 21%, IT 11%, sales 21%, marketing 5%, operations 8% and others 31% |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | -20%, 0%, +90% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AR, MX, UK, US and UY |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | AR and US |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 10 from 7 reviews over 1 year on Gartner |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 13K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2021 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $19.4M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 500K to 10M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | None |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | 9K per month. Top 3: 22% IN, 17% AR, 11% DE. Others 50% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 27 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, e-books and success cases |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | No |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | None |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | Free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (Strike scanner, Premium pentesting). None transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | DAST |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 6 targets |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Targets |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Strike |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No information available |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | No information available |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | No |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 37 from 24 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Contractor or employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 6 in common and 61 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 6 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools, AI and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5, none in common | Same, plus 1 | 1 |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Strike |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | Yes. No information available |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | No |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not break the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional | Same | None |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | External (Invicti for DAST) |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 15 in common and 4 additional | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 11 in common and 11 additional | Same | No |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12, 11 in common and 1 additional | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22, 10 in common and 12 additional | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional | 4, all in common | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 2 in common and 5 additional | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, all in common | 4 types of APIs, all in common |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | Yes |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types, 5 in common and 10 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, none in common | Same | 1 function |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license, totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Strike |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6 | Same | None |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 21 | Same | None |
| SCA | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | 1 |
The latest update to this comparison was on Mar 17, 2026. The primary sources of information was strike.sh, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Strike
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
apiasmcomparedastexploitationptaasscr