AppCheck
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to AppCheck's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | AppCheck |
| Focus | Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners | DAST |
| Extras | None | None | CMS security scanning and infrastructure scanning |
| Employees | 130 | Same | 98 |
| Reputation | 9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Clutch and Gartner | Same | 9.24 from 110 reviews over 2 years on G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 9K based on the following: LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research Firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2003 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Revenue | 5M to 10M | Same | 1M to 10M |
| CVE | 257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 13 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | ISO/IEC 27001 |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26% | Same | 6K per month. Top 3: 31% UK, 23% KG, 17% AZ and others 29% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 30 out of 100 |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | Azure |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | Free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplaces | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing drivers | Groups | Authors | No information available |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | AppCheck |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Resolution and response |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | CNA |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Standards | Some requirements from 65 standards, 10 in common and 55 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 10 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1 | 1 in common |
| Outputs | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 2 | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | AppCheck |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 18 | Same, plus 4 | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 10 attack surfaces, 7 in common and 3 additional | Same | 10 attacks surfaces, 7 in common and 3 additional |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, none in common | Same | No |
| Open source | MPL-2.0 license. Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Same | SaaS and on-premises |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 6 per year | Same | 1.3 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | AppCheck |
| SCM | 4 | Same | None |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | None |
| IDE | 2 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 20, 2 in common and 18 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| SCA | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Container | Native scanner | Same | None |
| SAST | Native scanner | Same | None |
| DAST | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | 3, all in common |
| CSPM | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
**More like AppCheck **
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.