Endor Labs
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Endor Labs’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Endor Labs |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Software Supply Chain Security |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 185 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 37%, IT 6%, sales 17%, marketing 5%, operations 4% and others 31% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +18%, +46%, +157% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IN, NL and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IN and US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.8 from 8 reviews over 1 year on G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 14K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Gartner, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2021 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $188M USD in 5 rounds from 20 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 5M to 50M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 27K per month. Top 3: 19% US, 16% NL, 14% NO. Others 51% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 32 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, solution brief, videos and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 4 in common and 9 additional | Same | 7 documentation sections, 4 in common and 3 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | Azure |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 30-day free trial and PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplace and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (core, pro, patches). None transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Per purchase order |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | AI security and SCA |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 5 users |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Users |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Endor Labs |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Availability, response and support |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | >=99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 5 in common and 62 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 7 standards, 5 in common and 2 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| False positives | 3.44 times better | 5.41 times better | 17% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 5.13 times better | 14.77 times better | 5% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 3, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Endor Labs |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 2 functionalities, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 3 sources, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v3.0, EPSS, KEV and SSVC |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and External (Semgrep for SAST) |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 13 in common and 10 additional | Same | 16 package managers, 13 in common and 3 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages , 5 in common and 7 additional | Same | 8 languages, 5 in common and 3 additional |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 12 in common and 10 additional | Same | 16 package managers, 12 in common and 4 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions , 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 7 distributions, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| **Source SAST ** **(languages) ** | 12 , 11 in common and 1 additional | Same | 14, 11 in common and 3 additional |
| **Source SAST ** **(frameworks) ** | 22 | Same | No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | SAST |
| IaC | 6Â , 1 in common and 5 additional | 4Â | 1 in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | 5 types of binaries, none in common |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 3 in common and 12 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 9 secrets types, 3 in common and 6 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 2 functions in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | MPL-2 license . Totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Endor Labs |
| SCM | 6 , 3 in common and 3 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 1 |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 21 , 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 5, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | 1 |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 1 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | 1 |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information were endorlabs.com and docs.endorlabs.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Endor Labs
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on