Snyk
Last updated: Nov 4, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Snyk's?
These tables compare the solutions of the two providers, attribute by attribute. Use them to compare the solutions for the cybersecurity requirements of your company. To learn what each attribute means, read the descriptions of the attributes.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | AI-powered pentesting, AI security posture management (AI-SPM) and Agentic Development Security (ADS) |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 1,573 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 51%, IT 12%, sales 9%, marketing 3%, operations 2% and others 23% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | +27%, +26%, +20% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AU, CA, CH, GB, IL, JP, PT, RO, SG and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | GB and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 8.65 from 475 reviews over 8 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 161K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Everest Group, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, Gartner, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, Latio and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2015 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $1.3B USD in 13 rounds from 42 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 12 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 111 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | FedRAMP Authorized, GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, PCI DSS and SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 872K per month. Top 3: 23% US, 7% IN, 6% GB. Others 64% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 54 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Articles, blog, case studies, cheat sheets, documentation, e-books, events, glossary, guides, infographics, lessons, podcast, reports, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 8 documentation sections, 5 in common and 3 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat(Discord) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 10 security education courses (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 114 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, GCP and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (Team and Enterprise). First transparent. |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Containers, IaC, SAST and SCA |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | 5 authors |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Authors and credits |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | Yes. Automated AI-PTaaS |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research powered by AI |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Availability and response |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Amazon Linux Ready Product, CNA, DevOps ISV Competency and Security ISV Competency |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 7 in common and 60 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 9 standards, 7 in common and 2 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI, automated tools and human intelligence |
| False positives | 1.21 times better | 1.90 times better | 49% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 1.07 times better | 3.07 times better | 25% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| Output | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2 | 9, 4 in common and 5 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 5 in common and 13 additional | Same | 9 sources, 5 in common and 4 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Transitivity and Use | Same | CCSS, CVSS v4.0 and EPSS v3.0 |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Asset classification policy |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 21 package managers, 19 in common and 2 additional | Same | 23 package managers, 19 in common and 4 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 14 languages, 5 in common and 9 additional | Same | 5 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Probabilistic |
| SBOM | 24 package managers, 19 in common and 5 additional | Same | 26 package managers, 19 in common and 7 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 15 distributions, 3 in common and 12 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14, 13 in common and 1 additional | Same | 20, 13 in common and 7 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23, 18 in common and 5 additional | Same | 40, 18 in common and 22 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | IaC and SAST |
| IaC | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional | 2, all in common | 5, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional | Same | 5 attack surface types, all in common |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, 2 in common and 2 additional | 2 types of APIs, all in common |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secrets | 313 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 5 functions, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same | 4 functions, 1 in common and 3 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | Yes |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (single and multi-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AU, EU and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 9.7 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 12 |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3, all in common | Same | 20, 3 in common and 17 additional |
| CI/CD | 23, 8 in common and 15 additional | Same | 10, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native and 12 integrations |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 4 integrations |
| MAST | None | Native | 1 |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | Native |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native and 1 integration |
| Remediation | None | None | 2 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 9 |
| Compliance | None | None | 3 |
Fluid Attacks last updated these tables on 2026-10-19. The primary sources of information were snyk.io and docs.snyk.io. Fluid Attacks also used specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Snyk
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your applications at no cost with the automated security testing of Fluid Attacks. Start your 21-day free trial and see the benefits of the Essential plan. The Advanced plan includes the expertise of the pentesting team of Fluid Attacks. To get the Advanced plan, complete this contact form.