Snyk
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Snyk's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 1,216 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 36%, IT 11%, sales 14%, marketing 5%, operations 3% and others 31% |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | -2%, -9%, +0% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AU, CA, CH, IL, JP, RO, SG, UK and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | UK and US |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.85 from 320 reviews over 8 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 145K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, GigaOM, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2015 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $1.2B USD in 12 rounds from 41 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 12 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 839 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27017 |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | 625K per month. Top 3: 18% US, 10% IN, 5% UK. Others 67% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 50 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation, e-books, podcast, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum, chat (discord) and talks |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 7 product use courses (free) and 7 security education courses (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 101 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, GCP and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (team, enterprise). First transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Containers, IaC, SAST and SCA |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 5 developers (active committers) |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Availability and response |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.9% per period |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Amazon Linux Ready Product, DevOps ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and CNA |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 15 in common and 52 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 16 standards, 15 in common and 1 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| False positives | 1.21 times better | 1.90 times better | 49% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 1.07 times better | 3.07 times better | 25% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 | 3, all in common |
| Output | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2 | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes (only for the Enterprise plan) |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources, none in common | Same | 6 sources, none in common |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | CCSS, CVSS v4.0 and EPSS v3.0 |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Asset classification policy |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (GitGuardian and Nightfall AI for Secrets) |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 17 in common and 2 additional | Same | 24 package managers, 17 in common and 7 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages, 5 in common and 7 additional | Same | 5 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Probabilistic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 8 in common and 14 additional | Same | 8 package managers, all in common |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12, all in common | Same | 18, 12 in common and 6 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22, 18 in common and 4 additional | Same | 41, 18 in common and 23 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | IaC |
| IaC | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional | 8, 7 in common and 1 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types, 2 in common and 5 additional | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types, 5 in common and 10 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 5 secrets types, all in common |
| AI | 4 functions, 1 in common and 3 additional | Same | 1 function in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license, totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AU, EU and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | 7.6 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Snyk |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 9 |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3, all in common | Same | 18, 3 in common and 15 additional |
| CI/CD | 21, 6 in common and 15 additional | Same | 7, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 11 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 14 integrations |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native powered by GitGuardian and 5 integrations |
| Remediation | None | None | 3 |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 6 |
| Compliance | None | None | 2 |
The latest update to this comparison was on Feb 18, 2026. The primary sources of information were snyk.com and docs.snyk.io, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Snyk
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
aspmautofixcomparedastiacmalwaremcpreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets