YesWeHack
Last updated: Feb 5, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to YesWeHack’s?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page .
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | YesWeHack |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Bug bounty |
| Extras | None | None | ASM, pentest management and vulnerability disclosure policy (VDP) |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 625 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40% , IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 31%, IT 6%, sales 19%, marketing 7%, operations 6% and others 31% |
| Headcount growth | +14% , +15%, -1% | Same | +13%, +33%, +85% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | CH, FR and SG |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | FR and IN |
| Reputation | 9.76 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.98 from 75 reviews over 5 years on G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 107K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2015 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $49.8M USD in 3 rounds from 9 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 10M to 73M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27017 |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 27K per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27% | Same | 210K per month. Top 3: 13% FR, 12% DZ, 12% IN. Others 63% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 40 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation and customer stories |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 8 documentation sections, 3 in common and 5 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 1 plan |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPMÂ , binary SAST, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SASTÂ , API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Bug bounty |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Campaign and vulnerability |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No information available |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | YesWeHack |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | Yes (as part of the bug bounty program) |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | Yes |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Independent researchers centralize zero-day vulnerabilities on a platform |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Response |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Penetration Testing by CREST |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 205 from 59 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Freelance |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 78 standards , 2 in common and 76 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 4 standards, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5Â , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| Output | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | YesWeHack |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same , plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | No |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not break the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | None |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Risk score |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | None |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12 | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6Â | 4Â | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions , none in common | Same | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | EU |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | 0.58 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | YesWeHack |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6 | Same | None |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 1 |
| IDE | 3 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 21 | Same | None |
| SCA | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on Mar 12, 2026. The primary sources of information were yeswehack.com and helpcenter.yeswehack.io, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like YesWeHack
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .