JFrog
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to JFrog’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Built-in scanners |
| Extras | None | None | AI/ML development and deployment, artifact management, cloud deployment, enterprise IoT management, MLSecOps, release lifecycle management and tool consolidation |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 2,228 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 10%, sales 11%, marketing 3%, operations 6% and others 38% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +6%, +14%, +41% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IL, US, JP, CN, FR, IN, ES and GB |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, IN and US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.51 from 132 reviews over 8 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner and PeerSpot |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 130K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | 451 Research, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, GigaOM and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2008 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $226.5M USD in 6 rounds from 12 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 8 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 87 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II and TISAX |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 241K per month. Top 3: 28% US, 8% IN, 7% DE. Others 57% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 51 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, data sheets, documentation, e-books, infographics, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 3 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 4 live security education courses (subscription-based) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | 6 product use courses with certification (subscription-based) and 1 product use course (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 310 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 Plans (pro, enterprise X, enterprise +). First transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | Binary repository, docker hub pulls and lifecycle management |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 25 GB base consumption |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Consumable storage and developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Response and availability |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | >=99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, DevOps ISV Competency and CNA |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 5 in common and 62 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 5 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| False positives | 4.21 times better | 6.62 times better | 14% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 17.55 times better | 6.10 times better | 4% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5Â , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 2, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 2 in common and 3 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , 2 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS v3.0 and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 12 in common and 11 additional | Same | 21 package managers, 12 in common and 9 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 11 in common and 11 additional | Same | 23 package managers, 11 in common and 12 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 , 6 in common and 6 additional | Same | 8, 6 in common and 2 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | SCA |
| IaC | 6Â | 4Â | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | 14 types of binaries, none in common |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types , 3 in common and 12 additional | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 12 secrets types, 3 in common and 9 additional |
| AI | 3 functions , none in common | Same | 1 function |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMER, APAC and EMEA |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
| SCM | 6 , 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | Native |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| CI/CD | 21 , 9 in common and 12 additional | Same | 11, 9 in common and 2 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | 1 |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was jfrog.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like JFrog
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on