JFrog
Last updated: Nov 4, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to JFrog's?
These tables compare the solutions of the two providers, attribute by attribute. Use them to compare the solutions for the cybersecurity requirements of your company. To learn what each attribute means, read the descriptions of the attributes.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Artifact Management |
| Extras | None | None | AST Scanners, Cloud Deployment, Enterprise IoT Management, MLSecOps, Release Lifecycle Management, Tool Consolidation |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 2,332 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 11%, sales 11%, marketing 3%, operations 6% and others 37% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | +4%, +15%, +35% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | CN, ES, FR, GB, IL, IN, JP, SG and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, IN and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 8.06 from 161 reviews over 9 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner and PeerSpot |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 145K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group and GigaOM |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2008 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $226.5M USD in 6 rounds from 12 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 8 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 100M to 500M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 184 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and TISAX |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 431K per month. Top 3: 15% US, 8% DE, 7% IN. Others 70% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 46 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Articles, blog, datasheets, documentation, e-books, events, executive brief, infographics, press releases, reports, research, use cases, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 3 in common and 10 additional | Same | 3 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 4 live security education courses (subscription-based) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 6 product use courses with certification (subscription-based) and 1 product use course (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 310 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial and PoC |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 3 plans (Pro, Enterprise X, Enterprise +). First two transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Binary repository, ML model registry, Docker Hub pulls and CI/CD integration |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | 25 GB base consumption |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | GB-based consumption (storage + transfer) |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Response and availability |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.9% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, CNA, DevOps ISV Competency and Security ISV Competency |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 5 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| False positives | 4.21 times better | 6.62 times better | 14% F0.5 score per quantity |
| False negatives | 17.55 times better | 6.10 times better | 4% F2.0 score per severity |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 2, all in common |
| Output | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2 | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 3 in common and 15 additional | Same | 7 sources, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Reachability, Transitivity, Use and VLAI | Same | CVSS v3.0 and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 21 package managers, 14 in common and 7 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 14 in common and 6 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 14 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | No information available |
| SBOM | 24 package managers, 11 in common and 13 additional | Same | 20 package managers, 11 in common and 9 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14, 8 in common and 6 additional | Same | 10, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23, 12 in common and 11 additional | Same | 43, 12 in common and 31 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | SCA |
| IaC | 6, 1 in common and 5 additional | 2, none in common | 1 in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary in common | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | 47 types of binaries, 1 in common and 46 additional |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| MAST | No | Native | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 313 secrets types, 112 in common and 201 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 138 secrets types, 112 in common and 26 additional |
| AI | 5 functions, none in common | Same | 3 functions, none in common |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (single and multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMER, APAC and EMEA |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | JFrog |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | Native |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, all in common | Same | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| CI/CD | 23, 8 in common and 15 additional | Same | 11, 8 in common and 3 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native |
| DAST | Native | Same | 1 |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Fluid Attacks last updated these tables on 2026-10-13. The primary sources of information were jfrog.com and docs.jfrog.com. Fluid Attacks also used specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like JFrog
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your applications at no cost with the automated security testing of Fluid Attacks. Start your 21-day free trial and see the benefits of the Essential plan. The Advanced plan includes the expertise of the pentesting team of Fluid Attacks. To get the Advanced plan, complete this contact form.
Tags
aiaspmautofixbinarybountycomparecontainersdastiacmalwaremcpreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets