Intruder
Last updated: Mar 25, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Intruder's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page. Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Intruder |
| Focus | Native ASPM with built-in scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners | DAST |
| Extras | None | None | PTaaS |
| Employees | 130 | Same | 77 |
| Reputation | 9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.66 from 228 reviews over 6 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 5K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2015 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $1.17M USD in 5 rounds from 3 investor |
| Revenue | 5M to 10M | Same | 10M to 50M |
| CVE | 257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 0 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | Cyber Essentials, SOC2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26% | Same | 34K per month. Top 3: 42% US, 9% IN, 6% CA and others 43% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 40 out of 100 |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | Azure and GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 14-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing drivers | Groups | Authors | Targets |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Intruder |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No information available |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | No information available |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | Vulnerability Assessment by CREST |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 12 from 9 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Standards | Some requirements from 65 standards, 7 in common and 58 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 7 standards, all in common |
| Detection | Automated tools | AI, Automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 2, all in common |
| Outputs | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2 | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Intruder |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | No |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Does not break the build |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 18 | Same, plus 4 | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 10 attack surface types, 3 in common and 7 additional | Same | 5 attack surface types, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, none in common | Same | No |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Same | SaaS |
| Regions | US | Same | UK |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 6 per year | Same | 0.7 per year |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Intruder |
| SCM | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, all in common | Same | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 2 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 20, 3 in common and 17 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| SCA | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Container | Native scanner | Same | None |
| SAST | Native scanner | Same | None |
| DAST | Native scanner | Same | Native scanner |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3, all in common | Same | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| CSPM | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native scanner | Same | None |
| Compliance | None | None | 2 |
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
More like Intruder
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.