Dynatrace
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to Dynatrace’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered observability platform |
| Extras | None | None | AI observability, Application observability, Business Analytics, Digital experience, Infrastructure observability, Log Analytics, Runtime application security (RAP, RVA and SPM), Software delivery and Threat observability |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 5,783 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 30%, IT 10%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 39% |
| Headcount drowth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +5%, +12%, +24% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AU, AZ, BE, BR, CA, CH, CN, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, EG, ES, FI, FR, HU, HK, HR, ID, IE, IL, IN, IT, JP, KR, KZ, MY, MX, NL, NO, NZ, PL, PT, SA, SE, SG, SK, TH, TR, UA, UK, US and ZA |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | AT, PL and US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.79 from 2,129 reviews over 13 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 439K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | 451 Research, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, Nucleus Research and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2005 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $21.9M USD in 4 round from 3 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 1 time and made 6 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1B to 10B |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, CSA STAR Level 2, FedRAMP, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 1 type II, SOC 2 Type II and StateRAMP Authorized |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59% | Same | 3.9M per month. Top 3: 65% US, 9% CA, 6% ES. Others 20% |
| Authority | 32 out of 100 | Same | 49 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, customer stories, documentation, events, e-books, fact sheets, glossary, infographic, partner story, playground, podcast, report, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | 8 documentation sections, 7 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 1 Live security education course (subscription-based) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | 13 product use courses (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 189 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 15-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 7 plans (Application Security, Full-Stack Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring, Kubernetes Platform Monitoring, Log Management & Analytics, Real User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring) |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | AI-powered observability platform |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 host with at least 8 GiB of RAM per one hour |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Host, host size and usage time |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Availability and support |
| Minimum availability | >=99.95% per minute LTM | Same | >=99.95% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration testing by CREST | Same | Amazon Linux Ready Product, Amazon RDS Ready Product, AWS Lambda Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS Graviton Ready Product, Cloud Operations Software, Containers ISV, DevOps ISV, Government ISV, Machine Learning ISV, Migration and Modernization ISV and Security ISV |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 6 in common and 61 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 15 standards, 6 in common and 9 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools and AI |
| Remediation | 5Â , 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 1 in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , none in common | Same , plus 1 functionality | 1 functionality |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources , none in common | Same | 2 sources, none in common |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, DSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 23 package managers | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| **Source SAST ** (languages) | 12 | Same | No |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6Â | 4Â | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 3 functions , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 2 functions, all in common |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AMEC, APAC and EMEA |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
| SCM | 6 | Same | None |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| CI/CD | 21 , 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | 2 |
| Container | Native | Same | 1 |
| SAST | Native | Same | 2 |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , all in common | Same | 6, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 3 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 1 |
| Compliance | None | None | 1 |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information were dynatrace.com and docs.dynatrace.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Dynatrace
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on