Dynatrace
Last updated: Oct 15, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Dynatrace's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered observability platform |
| Extras | None | None | AI observability, Application observability, Business observability, Digital experience, Infrastructure observability, Log analytics, Runtime application security (RAP, RVA and SPM), Software delivery and Threat observability |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 6,193 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 32%, IT 10%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 3% and others 38% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | +4%, +8%, +21% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AE, AT, AU, BE, BR, CA, CH, CN, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, HK, ID, IE, IL, IN, IT, JP, KR, MX, MY, NL, NO, NZ, PL, PT, SA, SE, SG, US and VN |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | AT, PL and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 8.90 from 4,914 reviews over 14 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 490K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | 451 Research, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, Gartner, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, Nucleus Research and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2005 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | 1.3B USD in 6 rounds from 4 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 1 time and made 9 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1B to 10B |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | None |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR Level 1, CSA STAR Level 2, EU-US DPF, FedRAMP Authorized, GDPR, ISO/IEC 45001, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, TISAX and TX-RAMP |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 1.5M per month. Top 3: 31% US, 10% IN, 6% IT. Others 53% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 49 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Analyst reports, blog, customer stories, documentation, e-books, events, fact sheet, glossary, guides, infographic, partner story, playground, podcast, reports, solution briefs, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | 8 documentation sections, 7 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | Forum |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 1 Live security education course (subscription-based) |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 23 product use courses (free) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 82 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 15-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 1 plan |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Runtime application protection, runtime vulnerability analytics and security posture management |
| Minimum scope | 100 authors | Same | 1 host with at least 8 GiB of RAM per one hour |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Host, host size and usage time |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Availability and support |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.5% per month |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST | Same | AI Software Competency, Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Graviton Ready Product, AWS Lambda Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, Cloud Operations Software Competency, Data Software Competency, DevOps ISV Competency, Financial Services Technology Competency, Government ISV Competency, Machine Learning ISV Competency, Migration and Modernization ISV Competency and Security ISV Competency |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 15 standards, 5 in common and 10 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI and automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 2, all in common |
| Output | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 2 | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, none in common | Same, plus 1 functionality | none in common |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 4 in common and 14 additional | Same | 5 sources, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Transitivity and Use | Same | CVSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | No |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 14 languages, 1 in common and 13 additional | Same | 1 language in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | No |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | Yes |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | No |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14 | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6 | 2 | No |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secrets | 228 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | 4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1 function | 4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (multi-tenant) + on-premises (single-tenant) |
| Regions | US | Same | AE, AU, BR, CA, CH, EU, GB, IL, IN, JP, SG and US |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Dynatrace |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional | Same | 3, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | 4 |
| Ticketing | 3, 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, all in common | Same | 3, all in common |
| CI/CD | 21, 8 in common and 13 additional | Same | 9, 8 in common and 1 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | 8 |
| Container | Native | Same | 5 |
| SAST | Native | Same | 5 |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | Native and 4 integrations |
| Secrets | Native | Same | None |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 2 |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-10-06. The primary sources of information were dynatrace.com and docs.dynatrace.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Dynatrace
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' pentesting team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
aisecurityaspmautofixbountycomparecspmmcpreachability