DragonJAR
Last updated: Nov 4, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to DragonJAR's?
These tables compare the solutions of the two providers, attribute by attribute. Use them to compare the solutions for the cybersecurity requirements of your company. To learn what each attribute means, read the descriptions of the attributes.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | DragonJAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | MPT | |
| Extras | None | None | Digital risk protection, red team, security training and social engineering testing |
| Headcount | 16 | ||
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Engineering 13%, IT 44%, marketing 6%, operations 6% and others 31% | |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | -6%, +14%, +7% | |
| Headquarters | CO and US | CO | |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | CO and UY | |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | No reviews |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 679K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2001 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | 1M to 10M | |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | None | |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | None |
| Bug bounty | No | ||
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | 26K per month. Top 3: 23% CO, 15% ES and 15% MX. Others 47% | |
| Authority | 28 out of 100 | ||
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, books, community, conference, courses, newsletters, reports and videos |
| Comprehensive documentation | No | ||
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat(Discord) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | 1 live security education course (paid) | |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Security education platform (subscription-based) | |
| Distribution | Same | Direct | |
| Marketplaces | None | ||
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | PoV | No | |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales | ||
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | No information available |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | MPT |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | No information available |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No information available |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | DragonJAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No. MPT |
| Reverse engineering | No | No information available | |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No information available |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | No information available | |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Accuracy, availability and response | No information available | |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | No information available | |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | None | ||
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 6 from 6 different types | |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | No | No information available | |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 10 in common and 57 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 13 standards, 10 in common and 3 additional |
| Detection method | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | Automated tools and human intelligence | |
| Remediation | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1 | 1 in common |
| Output | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 2 | 1 in common |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | DragonJAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | No | ||
| API | No | ||
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | No |
| CI/CD | Does not break the build | ||
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources | No information available | |
| Threat model alignment | No | ||
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Reachability, Transitivity, Use and VLAI | Same | No information available |
| Custom prioritization | No | ||
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | None |
| SCA | No | ||
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 14 languages | No | |
| Reachability type | Not applicable | ||
| SBOM | No | ||
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | No | ||
| Source SAST (languages) | No | ||
| Source SAST (frameworks) | No | ||
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | No | ||
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | No | ||
| API security testing | No | Yes. No information available | |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 313 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | No |
| AI | No | ||
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | Same | No information available | |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | DragonJAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | None | ||
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | None | ||
| ChatOps | None | None | None |
| IDE | 3 | None | |
| CI/CD | 23 | None | |
| SCA | Native | Same | None |
| Container | Native | Same | None |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | None | ||
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Fluid Attacks last updated these tables on 2026-10-13. The primary source of information was dragonjar.org. Fluid Attacks also used specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like DragonJAR
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your applications at no cost with the automated security testing of Fluid Attacks. Start your 21-day free trial and see the benefits of the Essential plan. The Advanced plan includes the expertise of the pentesting team of Fluid Attacks. To get the Advanced plan, complete this contact form.