CodeThreat
Last updated: Aug 4, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to CodeThreat's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | CodeThreat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house and external scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 2 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 50%, IT 50% and others 0% |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | -60%, -60%, -71% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | TR and US |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | TR |
| Reputation | 9.44 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 3.30 from 2 reviews over 1 year on Gartner |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 1K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2020 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 5M |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | None |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | GDPR and ISO/IEC 27001 |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 1K per month. Top 3: 4% AU, 19% IN and 76% US. Others 1% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 14 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation and videos |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 5 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | Chat(Slack) |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | GitHub |
| Freemium | No | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | No |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 2 plans (Pro and Enterprise). First transparent. |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | AI SAST, ASPM, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 author |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Authors |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | CodeThreat |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Support |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA, Penetration Testing by CREST and OpenSSF Gold Badge | Same | None |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | No | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, 10 in common and 57 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 11 standards, 10 in common and 1 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI and automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 2, all in common |
| Output | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2 | 7, 4 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | CodeThreat |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 3 functionalities, 1 in common and 2 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 6 in common and 12 additional | Same | 17 sources, 6 in common and 11 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS and EPSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (Gitleaks for secrets, OpenGrep for SAST, Syft for SBOM, Trivy for SCA, containers and IaC) |
| SCA | 19 package managers, 18 in common and 1 additional | Same | 25 package managers, 18 in common and 7 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | AI-based |
| SBOM | 22 package managers, 18 in common and 4 additional | Same | 25 package managers, 18 in common and 7 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions, all in common | Same | 15 distributions, 4 in common and 11 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12, all in common | Same | 21, 12 in common and 9 additional |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23, 17 in common and 6 additional | Same | 32, 17 in common and 15 additional |
| Custom rules | No | No | YAML pattern rules and AI semantic rules |
| IaC | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional | 2, all in common | 10, 5 in common and 5 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 171 secrets types, 33 in common and 57 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 70 secrets types, 33 in common and 37 additional |
| AI | 4 functions, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 function | 7 functions, 2 in common and 5 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | Yes |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | No |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) + on-premise (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | CodeThreat |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 4 in common and 2 additional | Same | 4, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | None |
| IDE | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 21, 5 in common and 16 additional | Same | 5, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native powered by Trivy |
| Container | Native | Same | Native powered by Trivy |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native powered by OpenGrep |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 | Same | None |
| CSPM | Native | Same | None |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native powered by Gitleaks |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-08-03. The primary sources of information were codethreat.com and docs.codethreat.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like CodeThreat
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
compareai-sastaspmcontainersiacreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets