BoostSecurity
Last updated: Jun 30, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to BoostSecurity?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | BoostSecurity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered native ASPM with in-house and third-party scanners |
| Extras | None | None | Software Supply Chain Security (SSCS) |
| Headcount | 157 | Same | 27 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 40%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25% | Same | Engineering 22%, IT 15%, sales 11%, marketing 7%, operations 4% and others 41% |
| Headcount growth | +14%, +15%, -1% | Same | -7%, -10%, +8% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | CA |
| Countries | AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | CA and US |
| Reputation | 9.44 from 228 reviews over 8 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 8.53 from 10 reviews over 2 years on Gartner |
| Followers | 22K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 3K based on the following: LinkedIn and X |
| Research firms | None | None | None |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2022 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $13M USD in 2 rounds from 8 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 2 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 2M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 8K per month. Top 3: 48% CA, 38% US and 8% IN. Others 6% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 22 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, case studies, documentation, news, solution briefs and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 7 in common and 6 additional | Same | 7 documentation sections, all in common |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | None |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | No |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | No information available |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | ASPM, containers, IaC, SAST, SBOM, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | No information available |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No information available |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | BoostSecurity |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research powered by AI |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | No information available |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | No information available |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA, Penetration Testing by CREST and OpenSSF Gold Badge | Same | None |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No |
| Channel control | No | Total | No |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards, none in common | All requirements from the same standards | 1 standard |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI and automated tools |
| Remediation | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 | 3, all in common |
| Output | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional | Same, plus 2 | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | BoostSecurity |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | GraphQL with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 functionality | 6 functionalities, 2 in common and 4 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, EPSS and OpenSSF Score |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Policy-based prioritization |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (Brakeman, CodeQL, GoSec and Semgrep for SAST; Checkov for IaC; Bundler-audit, Dependabot, Nancy, npm audit, OSV Scanner, Safety, Snyk and Trivy for SCA; Trivy for containers; GitLeaks for secrets; StackHawk for DAST; Checkmarx, SonarQube and BlackDuck via integrations) |
| SCA | 19 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages, 1 in common and 11 additional | Same | 2 languages, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Source SAST (languages) | 12 | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23 | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | Custom Gitleaks and Rego rules |
| IaC | 6, 3 in common and 3 additional | 2, none in common | 5, 3 in common and 2 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | Yes. No information available |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | Yes. No information available |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| Secrets | 142 secrets types, 80 in common and 62 additional | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | 100 secrets types, 80 in common and 20 additional |
| AI | 4 functions, 2 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 1 function | 2, all in common |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | Yes |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | BoostSecurity |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 5 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 21, 8 in common and 13 additional | Same | 8, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 3 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native powered by Trivy |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 3 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native powered by StackHawk |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | Native powered by Wiz |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 1 |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-06-23. The primary sources of information were boostsecurity.io and docs.boostsecurity.io, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like BoostSecurity
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.
Tags
ai-sastaspmbinarycomparecontainersdastiacmalwaremcpreachabilitysastsbomscasecrets