Trend Micro
Last updated: Oct 15, 2026
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Trend Micro's?
The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Trend Micro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Extended Detection and Response (XDR) |
| Extras | None | None | AI security, Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP), CSPM, data security, EASM, identity security, incident response, MDR, red team, SIEM, SOAR, threat intelligence and vulnerability management |
| Headcount | 186 | Same | 7,116 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42%, IT 12%, sales 16%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 24% | Same | Engineering 35%, IT 13%, sales 18%, marketing 3%, operations 4% and others 27% |
| Headcount growth | +3%, +21%, +29% | Same | 0%, 0%, +2% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | AE, AT, AU, BE, BR, CA, CH, CO, CZ, DE, DK, EG, ES, FI, FR, GB, HK, ID, IE, IL, IN, IT, JP, KR, MX, MY, NL, NO, NZ, PH, PL, QA, SA, SE, SG, TH, TR, TW, US, VN and ZA |
| Countries | AR, BO, BR, CL, CO, CR, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | CA, CN, IE, JP, PH, TW and US |
| Reputation | 9.27 from 388 reviews over 7 years on Clutch, G2 and Gartner | Same | 9.1 from 1,064 reviews over 11 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius |
| Followers | 23K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube | Same | 464K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Forrester, Gartner, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 1988 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | No information available |
| Acquisitions | None | None | Acquired 0 times and made 10 acquisitions |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1B to 10B |
| Third-Party CVEs Discovered | 289 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | 1,429 CVEs reported to MITRE |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, FedRAMP Authorized, GovRAMP, ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018, ISO/IEC 20243, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27014:2020, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27034-1:2011, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and TX-RAMP |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visits | 64K per month. Top 3: 18% CO, 9% US, 5% BR. Others 68% | Same | 6M per month. Top 3: 40% JP, 14% US and 8% TW. Others 38% |
| Authority | 33 out of 100 | Same | 66 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | Discovered and third-party |
| Content | Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, documentation, events, glossary, news, podcast, reports, success stories, threat encyclopedia, videos and webinars |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections, 6 in common and 7 additional | Same | 7 documentation sections, 6 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | 6 live courses |
| Async training | 3 product use courses, all free | Same | 2 security education courses (subscription-based) |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS, Azure and GCP |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | 30-day free trial |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales and marketplace |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 1 plan (TrendAI Flex) |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | No information available |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: AI SAST, API security testing, MAST, PTaaS, RE and SCR | Extended Detection and Response (XDR) |
| Minimum scope | 10 authors | Same | No information available |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Credits |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No information available |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Trend Micro |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No. MPT |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No information available |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No information available |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | Yes |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | Yes |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | No information available |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | Scanner-based zero-day vulnerability detection | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research powered by AI |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy, availability and response | Availability and response |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per year | Same | 99.9% per quarter |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accreditations | CNA, Penetration Testing by CREST and OpenSSF Gold Badge | Same | AI Software Competency, Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Built-in Competency, AWS Graviton Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, AWS Security Incident Response Ready, Cloud Operations Software Competency, CNA, DevOps ISV Competency, Government ISV Competency, Healthcare ISV Competency, MSSP Software Competency, Security ISV Competency and Small and Medium Business Software Competency |
| Pentester certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | 88 from 29 different types |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee |
| Endpoint control | No | Total | No information available |
| Channel control | No | Total | No information available |
| Standards | Some requirements from 87 standards, 13 in common and 74 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 37 standards, 13 in common and 24 additional |
| Detection method | Automated tools | AI, automated tools and human intelligence | AI, automated tools and human intelligence |
| Remediation | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same, plus 1 | 5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| Output | 5, 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 2 | 7, 4 in common and 3 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Trend Micro |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | No |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | REST with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities | Same, plus 1 functionality | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 18 sources, 2 in common and 16 additional | Same | 3 sources, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS, Fixing cost, KEV, Reachability, Transitivity, Use and VLAI | Same | CVSS |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | Asset criticality |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | In-house and external (Greenbone, Nessus Pro, Qualys, Rapid7, Tanium Comply and Tenable for vulnerability assessment) |
| SCA | 21 package managers, 10 in common and 11 additional | Same | 15 package managers, 10 in common and 5 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability | 14 languages | Same | No |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Not applicable |
| SBOM | 24 package managers, 8 in common and 16 additional | Same | 15 package managers, 8 in common and 7 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions, all in common | Same | 17 distributions, 4 in common and 13 additional |
| Source SAST (languages) | 14 | Same | No |
| Source SAST (frameworks) | 23 | Same | No |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6, 2 in common and 4 additional | 2, none in common | 4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same, plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | No |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | No |
| MAST | No | Yes | No |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secrets | 313 secrets types | Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 5 functions, 2 in common and 3 additional | Same | 5 functions, 2 in common and 3 additional |
| AI SAST | No | Yes | No |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | No | No | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS (no tenancy information) + on-premise (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | AE, AU, CA, EU, GB, ID, IN, JP, SG, US and ZA |
| Status | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incidents | 3 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | Trend Micro |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 6, 1 in common and 5 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3, 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 7, 1 in common and 6 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 | Same | None |
| CI/CD | 23, 2 in common and 21 additional | Same | 2, all in common |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native |
| Container | Native | Same | Native |
| SAST | Native | Same | None |
| DAST | Native | Same | None |
| MAST | None | Native | None |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 1 in common | Same | 5, 1 in common and 4 additional |
| CSPM | Native | Same | Native |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | 8 |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
The latest update to this comparison was on 2026-10-14. The primary sources of information were trendaisecurity.com and docs.trendmicro.com, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Trend Micro
Free trial — Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' pentesting team, fill out this contact form.