OX Security
How does Fluid Attacks’ solution compare to OX Security’s? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page . Organization
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
| Focus | Native ASPM with in-house scanners | AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners | Native ASPM with in-house scanners |
| Extras | None | None | None |
| Headcount | 143 | Same | 186 |
| Headcount distribution | Engineering 42% , IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26% | Same | Engineering 25%, IT 12%, sales 18%, marketing 4%, operations 5% and others 36% |
| Headcount growth | +8% , +10%, -8% | Same | +7%, +19%, +88% |
| Headquarters | CO and US | Same | IL and US |
| Countries | AR , BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US | Same | IL, PL and US |
| Reputation | 9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch | Same | 9.47 from 72 reviews over 2 years on Capterra, G2 and Gartner |
| Followers | 20K based on the following: Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , X and YouTube | Same | 45K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube |
| Research firms | None | None | Frost & Sullivan, IDC and Omdia |
| Founded | 2001 | Same | 2021 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Same | $94M USD in 4 rounds from 9 investors |
| Acquisitions | None | None | None |
| Revenue | 10M to 15M | Same | 1M to 38M |
| CVEs as CNA Researcher | 276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide | Same | Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3 | Same | SOC 2 Type II |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes | No |
| Visits | 22K per month. Top 3: 23% IN, 22% CO, 15% UK. Others 40% | Same | 33K per month. Top 3: 18% IL, 17% US, 11% PL and others 54% |
| Authority | 31 out of 100 | Same | 37 out of 100 |
| Public vulnerability DB | Discovered and third-party | Same | None |
| Content | Blog , documentation , e-books , glossary , reports, success stories , videos , webinars and white papers | Same | Blog, case studies, data sheets, documentation, events, podcast, reports, videos, webinars and white papers |
| Comprehensive documentation | 13 documentation sections , 5 in common and 8 additional | Same | 6 documentation sections, 5 in common and 1 additional |
| Community | Forum | Same | No |
| Sync training | 1 workshop | Same | No |
| Async training | 3 product use courses , all free | Same | No |
| Distribution | Direct or with any of its 14 partners | Same | Direct or with any of its 58 partners |
| Marketplaces | AWS | Same | AWS and Azure |
| Freemium | No | No | No |
| Free trial | 21-day free trial | PoV | PoV |
| Demo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open demo | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Contact sales and marketplace | Contact sales | Contact sales, marketplaces and public web |
| Pricing tiers | 1 plan | 1 plan | 4 plans (Startup, professional, scale and enterprise). First 2 transparent |
| Minimum term | Monthly | Monthly | Annually |
| Minimum payment period | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Minimum capabilities | ASPM , binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets | Same plus: API security testing , PTaaS, RE and SCR | SAST, SCA and secrets |
| Minimum scope | 1 author | Same | 1 developer |
| Pricing drivers | Authors | Same | Developers |
| Free implementation | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free support | Yes | Yes | No |
Service
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
| PTaaS | No | Yes | No |
| Reverse engineering | No | Yes | No |
| Secure code review | No | Yes | No |
| Pivoting | No | Yes | No |
| Exploitation | No | Yes | No |
| Manual reattacks | Not applicable | Unlimited reattacks | Not applicable |
| Zero-day vulnerabilities | None | Continuous zero-day vulnerability research | None |
| SLA | Availability | Accuracy , availability and response | Support |
| Minimum availability | 99.95% per minute LTM | Same | None |
| After-sale guarantees | No | Yes | No |
| Accreditations | CNA and Penetration testing by CREST | Same | None |
| Hacker certifications | Not applicable | 202 from 59 different types | Not applicable |
| Type of contract | Employee | Same | Employee or freelance |
| Endpoint control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Channel control | Not applicable | Total | Not applicable |
| Standards | Some requirements from 67 standards , 9 in common and 58 additional | All requirements from the same standards | 9 standards, all in common |
| Detection method | Automated tools | Automated tools , AI and human intelligence | Automated tools |
| Remediation | 5Â , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same, plus 1Â | 4, all in common |
| Outputs | 5Â , 3 in common and 2 additional | Same, plus 2Â | 4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
Product
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
| ASPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | GraphQL with JSON | Same | GraphQL with JSON |
| IDE | 5 functionalities , 4 in common and 1 additional | Same , plus 1 functionality | 5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD | Breaks the build | Same | Breaks the build |
| Vulnerability sources | 4 sources | Same | No information available |
| Threat model alignment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Priority criteria | CVSS v4.0 , CVSSF , EPSS and KEV | Same | CVSS, EPSS and KEV |
| Custom prioritization | Priority score | Same | No |
| Scanner origin | In-house | In-house | None |
| SCA | 23 package managers , 14 in common and 9 additional | Same | 17 package managers, 14 in common and 3 additional |
| AI security | No | Yes | No |
| Reachability | 12 languages , 7 in common and 5 additional | Same | 7 languages, all in common |
| Reachability type | Deterministic | Same | Deterministic |
| SBOM | 22 package managers , 10 in common and 12 additional | Same | 17 package managers, 10 in common and 7 additional |
| Malware detection | Yes | Yes | No |
| Autofix on components | No | No | No |
| Containers | 4 distributions | Same | Yes. No information available |
| **Source SAST ** **(languages) ** | 12 , all in common | Same | 15, 12 in common and 3 additional |
| **Source SAST ** (frameworks) | 22 | Same | Yes. No information available |
| Custom rules | No | No | No |
| IaC | 6Â , 4 in common and 2 additional | 4Â | 4, all in common |
| Binary SAST | 1 type of binary | Same , plus 2 types of binaries | No |
| DAST | 7 attack surface types | Same | Yes. No information available |
| API security testing | No | 4 types of APIs | Yes. No information available |
| IAST | No | No | No |
| CSPM | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ASM | No | No | No |
| Secrets | 15 secrets types | Same , plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability | Yes. No information available |
| AI | 3 functions , 2 in common and 1 additional | Same | 5 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional |
| MCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open-source | MPL-2.0 license , totally equivalent to the paid version | Not applicable | No |
| Provisioning as code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS (multi-tenant) | Same | SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information) |
| Regions | US | Same | No information available |
| Status | Yes | Yes | No |
| Incidents | 4 per year | Same | No information available |
Integrations
| Attribute | Essential | Advanced | OX |
| SCM | 6 , all in common | Same | 6, all in common |
| Binary repositories | None | None | None |
| Ticketing | 3 , all in common | Same | 7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
| ChatOps | None | None | 2 |
| IDE | 3 , 1 in common and 2 additional | Same | 1 in common |
| CI/CD | 21 , 8 in common and 13 additional | Same | 10, 8 in common and 2 additional |
| SCA | Native | Same | Native and 18 integrations |
| Container | Native | Same | Native and 18 integrations |
| SAST | Native | Same | Native and 15 integrations |
| DAST | Native | Same | Native and 5 integrations |
| IAST | None | None | None |
| Cloud | 3 , all in common | Same | 3, all in common |
| CSPM | Native | Same | 9 |
| Secrets | Native | Same | Native and 8 integrations |
| Remediation | None | None | None |
| Bug bounty | None | None | None |
| Vulnerability management | None | None | None |
| Compliance | None | None | None |
Tip
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 27, 2025. The primary sources of information were ox.security and docs.ox.security, which were supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
**More like OX Security **
Tip
Free trialSearch for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks’ automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan . If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks’ hacking team, fill out this contact form .
Last updated on